by Jean de Boissière
He wrote in the 1940-50s. A note on the de Boissieres. They were Huguenot
not Catholic. Founder, Jean Velleton de Boisierre anglicized his name to Joun Boissiere
not Catholic. Founder, Jean Velleton de Boisierre anglicized his name to Joun Boissiere
for-closed on Champs Elysées. His father was one of the 500 during the Directorate in France
They did not marry the other French families and worked very closely with the English. Eric Williams came from the black side of that family.
Some eighty years ago, the
leading people of Trinidad the (plantation owners) were hard working
industrious folk who exploited the
masses shamefully in the interest of what they thought was a sound conception of
society.
Embodied in this conception was a
firm belief in the family unit as the very basis of that society. this made one
of their first principles the establishment and strengthening of large family
groups. Another solid conviction was their faith in religion as a force
essential to the past, the present and the future. It was not an empty
conviction for they propagandised that faith among the thousands of illiterate
who came under their influence.
To these people (the freed Negro
slaves and the East Indian indentured labourers who were their workers) they
extended a regard for their material as well as their spiritual welfare. In
practice, this welfare was administered in a completely despotic but benevolent
manner. A gardener got a dollar a week, and if he forgot himself and his place
so far as to demand fifty cents more as his just wages, he would be chased from
the estate. But if he asked for a spot of land to build his shack, or five
dollars to christen a child, he was given it and more with a paternal
graciousness that made him feel that he was as much part of that family unit as its oldest son.
The elder Creoles of three generations back were in most instances conservatively constructive, paternal and kind. That they were unaware of an industrial revolution that was torturing Europe and which would eventually destroy their work and their world, that they accepted the status quo with the same faith that they did their God was not their fault. In their time and place they could not possibly have done otherwise.
The elder Creoles of three generations back were in most instances conservatively constructive, paternal and kind. That they were unaware of an industrial revolution that was torturing Europe and which would eventually destroy their work and their world, that they accepted the status quo with the same faith that they did their God was not their fault. In their time and place they could not possibly have done otherwise.
If one could accuse them of
crime, it could be only for that
of spawning the generation that followed them. No single excuse could be found
for these. Their parents graciously cheated the masses in order to create a
surplus to send these hopes-of-the-world for
an education in a Europe that was perpetually seething with an under-current of
industrial and political unrest. For all they saw of this they might as well
been blindfolded before they left. But what they did see and learn was the unscrupulous
selfishness of the bourgeois class, rampant in the jungle they had made out of
European civilization.
When they returned, the adulation
and regard with which they were greeted was completely misinterpreted. They
looked upon it rather in the way a millionaire's son does on the salutes of the
sailors from his father's yacht. The first practical application of the lessons
they had learnt was in their treatment of these workers on their plantations.
No more benevolent despotism. The
attitude was now that of the European bourgeois to their factory workers.
Ruthless individualism replaced the former almost feudal arrangement. It was
expressed in such phrases as these: "The gardener get his wages - and his
standard of living doesn't justify his getting any more. So why should we give
him free lands for a house, when we can get rents from those lands, everything
must make a profit. If they don't want to use the estate barracks and want to
live above their means - and they always were a lazy, spend-thrift lot anyway -
let them rent the land."
To their industrious parents who
had worked and cleared the estate of all encumbrances, meanwhile building whole
villages for their workers, they would talk in this strain.
"Mother, I don't see why you
keep on giving money to these people to christen their children, when you know
very well that they are a vicious immoral lot and all of their children are
bastards anyway - and the amount of
money you waste giving away rosaries and prayer books, they can well
afford to buy themselves. This would make them appreciate them more than when
they get them for nothing anyway."
In like manner to this, they
undertook to inaugurate and establish the regime of unrestricted capitalism on
the plantations of their fathers. Any resistance to them was met with cruel
suppression. They did not stop at attacking the workers, they carried the
battle for these new principles (or more correctly lack of principles) right
into their own families. The survival of the fittest , the crowning of cunning, and the law of the
jungle had to be established here too. Where their parents had assisted members
of the family in their moments of distress, they used such moments to take
advantage of them Instead of the financially embarrassed member getting help,
he would be forced to sell whatever he had left to the stronger relatives at a
colossal sacrifice.
One would have thought that this
would have brought some qualms of conscience. It did; but gave them little
trouble as they had a bourgeois conscience; the most elastic produced yet. They
insisted on a strict honesty that left them masters of the embarrassing
situations created very dubiously for their opponents. The elastic of their
conscience expanded with creating the situation and contracted visibly in
handling it.
In morals they insisted on an
ultra-puritanical code for their own wives and daughters, while those of their
labourers were invariably supposed to submit to the advances made prior to any
work or land being given on the estate. While the older generation had
occasionally lapsed and produce children with women on the estate which they
acknowledged and supported (in some instances even giving them a European
education), the new one ignored and abandoned the innumerable bastards they
begot as a preliminary to the day's work in the cocoa.
Not satisfied with turning the
estate and its workers into a machine from which they could grind money for a
self-centered empty life of pleasure, they sought official positions in the
government, where their most arduous work was done in jockeying for the highest
paid jobs. The first step was to reduce the work of the department to a minimum
and then to arrange for the terrifically underpaid subordinates to carry on the
work, while they spent their time on the galleries of their clubs, sipping
drinks and slaying peoples reputation with an impressive dignity.
There is one classic case worth
mentioning of a head of a department who, having arranged his official life in
like manner to suit himself (to have told this man that he was a servant of the
public and owed them a duty would have been to grossly insult him), he would
turn up at his office everyday at 11 o/clock and leave at midday. For over 15
years, he drew about $ 400 per month of the public's money for sitting at a
desk for five hours a week. He eventually retired a short while before it was
absolutely necessary because as he boasted to his friends, his "conscience
hurt him".
They attended church every Sunday
with an eye to subtle publicity, for they went always to the biggest ones where
they would be seen by the most people. But the simple Christina virtues of
unheralded charity, kindness and love were completely absent from their makeup.
In their lifetime, they succeeded
in deranging the social order created by their forbears so completely, that the
former good relations that existed between the classes disappeared and the same
social disorder and unrest that haunted Europe permeated the island.
Some of these supreme
individualists still exist and linger in the estate houses, the position of
government and the benches of the larger churches. They are few now and these
ladies and gentlemen of the most incredibly selfish generation will pass away,
but it will take more than a little time to heal the wounds they made on the
body social that their forefathers brought forth."
Buy "The Book of Trinidad" by clicking here:
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Buy "A Rada Community in Trinidad" by clicking here:
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Buy "The Book of Trinidad" by clicking here:
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Amazon
Barnes & Noble