It
will be interesting to record some of the facts regarding the construction of
this old building as well as some information concerning it given by the late
Mr. Thomas James St. Hill, six months before his death at the age of 90 in the
1930s, who, as a boy, had played around it and had frequent opportunities of
roaming about its rooms.
In describing it he said the house had no pretensions to
architectural beauty, but the interior was nicely furnished. The ceiling and
sides were of plaster of Paris; the walls were of tapia made from black
pick-mock roseau, grown in the forest, split into three, with the pith scooped
out and tapia laid between.
The tapia was covered with white lime plaster, and plaster of
Paris was laid over all. There was a chandelier in each of the two large rooms,
the drawing room and the ballroom. Stucco work was around the chandeliers,
while a gilt frieze ran around the rooms at the top. The doors were of cedar
and nicely worked in design; the locks were brass ones about eight or nine
inches wide, the staircase was six feet wide, the balustrade of which was of
mahogany with turned rails.
A marble stair ran from the ground floor to the landing,
comprising twelve steps of black and white. There was a front gallery twelve
feet wide, and, apart from the two large rooms described above the interior,
was not otherwise large, so this gallery was often used as a dining verandah
for balls and other purposes. The principal doors were of glass; there were no
jalousie windows, but glass sashes; the reception room was marble-tiled and the
staircase to the west, leading from the dining room to the garden was of red
tiles. The upper part that ran to the north was two-storied, otherwise it was a
one-storey building.
Mr. St. Hill further stated that this building, which had at one
time been used as a Government House, was occupied for a good many years by the
Hon. Ashton Warner, Chief Judge of the Colony, until his decease in 1830. Mr.
Warner was the last occupier of this building, and from that time it fell into
decay and ruin. On being asked why it was never tenanted subsequently, he
remarked that it was supposed to be situated in an unhealthy locality, being
greatly exposed to the north winds and that someone had died there of a
malignant type of fever.
When giving the information recorded above, he also drew the
ground plan of the building from memory. These measurements were duly checked
by a local architect and found to be correct in every detail. This plan,
however, has unfortunately been misplaced by the architect. It would have been
interesting to reproduce it along with this photograph and the description of
the interior. It would also be of interest to find out from what point this
view was originally sketched. Mr. St. Hill further stated that when the
Prince's Building was being built in 1861, this old property was demolished in
order to obtain bricks to be used in the construction of the new building.
From parliamentary papers relating to the island of Trinidad of
18th February, 1823, we gather that the Belmont lands were leased to the
government from January 1803 and that these were the lands "on which the
Government House and buildings and the negro houses are erected". And
further "at the time of the original contract for lease of land by
colonial government there was only a small house 36 ft. x 18 ft. built of
American timber, shingled and floored and a small hut covered with straw upon
the said lands: the former building was newly shingled and repaired by the
government previous to its occupation of the property".
As 'Paradise Estate' was bought by the government in 1825 and the
great house thereon used as Government House, we think it could safely be
averred that the governors who occupied this house were governors Hislop, Munro
and Woodford from 1803—1825.
We are glad to be able to place on record these important
facts regarding this historic building about which, until now, little has been
publicly known. Indeed, there is one common theory about this place that this
document explodes and that is that, the building on the Belmont Hill was never
a Government House. There is abundant evidence to disprove this. Trinidad is
thus greatly indebted to Sir Normal Lamont and the late Mr. T.J. St. Hill.
We are further indebted to Mr. T.I. Potter for the information
regarding this property and the section taken at law by claimants to the land,
as subjoined:
The old 'Government Cottage' on Belmont Hill.
The history of the old ruins to be seen on the crest of the hill
which overlooks the city and the harbour of Port of Spain from what is now
called Belmont Pasture is interesting.
The Belmont Estate, which apparently did not comprise much more
than the present pasture and the ridge to the north-east of it, although the
whole district to the south has taken the name, was a very old occupancy held
by a Spaniard whose name is not recorded, because very probably, he was a
squatter. In 1780 this man sold his holding to one Riviere, an immigrant to
this island from St. Vincent. Riviere, in his turn, sold the occupancy to Don
Francis Pasqual de Soler, who conveyed it to Edward Barry (a member of the firm
of Barry & Black) on the 16th December, 1784, for the sum of "$900 of
eight bits", (whatever that may be).
Edward Barry died some time after the purchase and the
representative of his estate leased the lands and buildings, the cultivation
(only 'provisions and plantains') having been abandoned, to the governor of the
island as a site for a country residence, at a yearly rental of $1,200, and
gave him a preferential option of purchasing the property at a fair valuation
whenever the heirs of Barry could give a legal title to the lands. The
residence was erected the same year, and Governor Hislop was the first tenant
of it.
In the year 1811, the heirs of Barry got into financial
difficulties, and Messrs. Park and Heywood took the Belmont property in
execution. The court ordered an appraisement to be made, and the governor,
Major General Monro, was notified of it. He objected to the inclusion of the
governor's residence in the appraisement, and it appears that nothing was done
until the 30th April, 1814, when notice of the order for appraisement was
served on the new governor, Sir Ralph Woodford, who at once referred the matter
to the attorney-general (Henry Fuller) in order that the interest of the crown
in the property might be represented in the suit. On the 24th May, 1814, he
directed the attorney-general to limit his objection to the valuation of the
buildings.
The title of Belmont Estate was then raised, and the matter came
into the court of first instance before the chief judge (John T. Bigge), who,
after hearing the arguments of the attorney-general and the representatives of
the heirs of Barry, dismissed the claim of the crown, and held that this title
of the heirs of Barry to Belmont Estate was good, and he warranted it.
The attorney-general appealed against this decision to the court
of civil appeal, which, at that time, was the court of intendant as regards
matters relating to lands of the colony. This court had very large powers
there.
The governor was the president of this court, and he had as his
legal assistant a judge of the colony, who was called the 'assessor'.
After hearing both sides, the president reversed the decision of
the chief justice, and decreed that the act of a servant cannot forfeit the
right of the lord paramount, that no grant had been issued to any one, of the
lands forming the Belmont Estate, and that there was no prescription against
the crown in the colony, therefore His Majesty had never been divested of the
ownership of the lands which formed Belmont Estate; but that the heirs of Barry
could sue for compensation under a recent British proclamation dealing with
crown lands and lands occupied in the island, which gave compensation in land
to occupiers, in certain cases, where lands were resumed from them for public
purposes; and that the rent received by the heirs of Barry would be taken into
account in considering the question of compensation.
The representative of the heirs of Barry applied for leave to
appeal to the Privy Council, which was granted, and the vexed question was
submitted for final decision to that tribunal.
The case of the claim of the crown to the lands of Belmont, and
the alleged arbitrary action of Sir Ralph Woodford in the matter formed one of
the many grievances of the Committee of Landholders of Trinidad, headed by the
late Joseph Marryat, M.P., in their petition in 1816 to the Secretary of State
against what they considered to be the aggressive and tyrannical administration
of the government of the colony by that governor.
Belmont Estate
eventually became crown land, and the 'Government Cottage' was occupied by the
governors of the colony until the 'Great House' of the 'Paradise Estate,'
(which property had been purchased from the Peschier family and was converted
into the Botanical Gardens and Queen's Park) was fixed up as a govenor's
residence. It was then apparently abandoned and fell into decay. It is today
the site of the Hilton Hotel.
No comments:
Post a Comment